Tuesday, February 12, 2013
1989
wasn't a terribly good year
for DC Atlanteans -
so why would we pick
this ''special'' issue
published that year
which could easily be
the worst Aquaman tale ever
as our very first
*official*
luminous review
of sequential art
material
here, on the
Literati Blog...?
Well, because from this point onwards,
after we've dealt with this here,
the buoyancy can only be fine!
Hence, let us proceed immediately...
Another admitted and obvious reason to pick this one
is the fact that these guys publish drivel,
for years on end,
(heck, for decades...!)
and then they have the nerve to pretend
that they are in an elite of sorts
and that their readers have no clue how it's done...
Or how it should be done!
Well, suffice it to say,
back in 1989,
little luminous me
was a reader, an avid one at that...
And an extremely disappointed one, too,
once I'd finished perusing this atrocity here...!
The cover is just fine, even classic:
for a George, Freeman wasn't a bad artist at all
- but then, we do not judge a book by its cover;
much less a comic-book!
For to do so, would be to fall (back)
into a time-honoured trap...!
Well, not that time-honoured, really;
comic-bookies, as they have been
for several decades now,
have only existed since World War II
- as they were the ideal propaganda vehicle
to deliver the messages the Establishment
wanted promptly delivered, back then...
Aquaman himself was born in 1941,
as one of several anti-nazi,
four-color disbelief-suspending bashers!
There were Daredevil (not the one Affl-aa-ck! portrayed)
Silver Streak, Flint Baker, Magno
Captain America, The Shield, The Phantom,
The Spectre, The Vision,
Wonder Woman, Ms. America, Nevana,
as well as Batty and Superman, of course.
All of them were valiant and brave,
as they thwarted the Nazis with ease!
If only it had been so easy in real life...
But we have digressed already...
In 1989, somehow, I've no idea how,
Dan Mishkin and Gary Cohn
tricked the powers-that-be at DC
into believing that they were good at what they did
and that they had not one but several
good stories to tell, about a myriad of characters...
They got published on many occasions indeed:
rehashing material they would pilfer from just about
everywhere: from Tolkien to Mattel!
When DC thought it would be good to
do something with Aquaman fast,
just to keep him (somewhat) in the spotlight
three years removed from the widely-successful
and critically-acclaimed 1986 mini-series
that saw him sport a new BLUE costume,
these two scoundrel-swindler-scribes came along
with this worthless, unreadable story -
and since they succeeded, primarily and solely,
in creating an uneasy symbiosis
between the two Aquamen
(the classic orange & green guy
and the new blue-look guy)
the abominable script got the go
and was approved for publication!
Journeymen Freeman & Pacella were assigned
the vital art chores - and though they tried to,
they couldn't truly flesh out this horrible
mish-mash of a tale, the script they'd been given,
to anyone's satisfaction...
Mishkin & Cohn penned an unnameable atrocity here
and Aquaman had to pay the price for it -
it was back into limbo for him after this
until a mid-1990's so-so effort
saw him inherit the 80's artistic team
that did woeful things for the
Superman books published back then...!
And then he got another shot
with some homegrown talent
that fizzled as quick
as the Kevin Maguire covers
-meant to sell the stuff-
came to irritate the eye, instead...
And it was limbo once more
for a number of years after that - again.
Poor Sea King...
It wouldn't be until the late 1990's
that he got a bankable shot
with Peter David
and an artist deemed ''cool'' by the readership!
But that is another story...
As for Dan & Gary here...
Just like other four-color scribes,
wordsmiths such as
Peter B. Gillis,
Jeph Loeb
and
Peter Tomasi,
this dynamic duo de merde
can be credited with turning off ''comics''
an astronomical number of readers...
Indeed, these guys did more for the demise
of both the medium as the industry that it is
than any other negative
said ''industry'' has got going against it...!
The thing to marvel about here is that,
unlike the other dudes,
D&G had to be two
in order to get it done!
Most other crappy so-called wordsmiths
of this misbegotten craft and medium
could manage the feat
all by themselves
- with the consent and invaluable assistance
of their editors and publisher, sure,
but still, they did it alone!
DC's D&G act had to be perpetrated as a duo
in order to produce so much abysmal material
(Amethyst, Blue Devil - to name but two)
that very nearly destroyed the DC Universe -
and, these days, I am one of those
to say that perhaps
it should have...!
It boggles the mind, too, that they had to be four
officially, but really six or seven
(counting letterer & colorist)
in order to produce this unsavory tale
doubled of a sub-par product
(so much so, you'd think it's a
Sub-Mariner book!)
- a pathetic clash ''that never was''
between the Sea King and a certain Magus -
most certainly lifted straight up
from the John Fowles novel!
(Certainly not from Jim Starlin's stuff -
although this would be one more thing
Aquaman has in common with Adam Warlock;
besides the hair and bad karma, that is.
But we're just getting side-tracked now...)
If only Steve Skeates had done this instead,
circa 1969, at least it would have been bearable;
it would have suffered from other
problems, as all Skeates fare did, too,
to be truthful - but it would have been better.
Way better than this drivel in cheap print!
$1.50 was already incredibly overpricing it,
and this applied to all DC and Marvel comic-bookies!
Imagine by today's pricing standards...
Two thumbs waaaaaay down
- below the waves!
So sorry, AQ!
+++